HPTN 069/ACTG A5305: phase II study of maraviroc-containing regimens for HIV PrEP in United States (U.S.) women
Citation
Gulick R, Wilkin T, Chen Y, Landovitz R, Amico R, Young A, Richardson P, Marzinke M, Hendrix C, Eshleman S, McGowan I, Andrade A, Hodder S, Klingman K, Chege W, Rinehart A, Rooney J, Andrew P, McCauley M, Mayer K, HPTN 069/ACTG 5305 Study Team. HPTN 069/ACTG A5305: phase II study of maraviroc-containing regimens for HIV PrEP in United States (U.S.) women.
Abstract
Background: Maraviroc (MVC) is an HIV entry inhibitor that concentrates in the genital tract/rectum, making it a potential PrEP agent. Methods: Prospective, randomized, double-blinded, multisite, safety/tolerability study of 4 regimens for HIV PrEP: (1) MVC alone; (2) MVC + emtricitabine (FTC); (3) MVC + tenofovir (TDF); (4) TDF + FTC. Study regimens consisted of 3 pills once-daily -- MVC 300 mg, FTC 200 mg, TDF 300 mg, with matching placebos. Eligible participants were adult HIV-uninfected women who reported a history of condomless vaginal or anal intercourse with >1 HIV-infected or unknown-serostatus man within 90 days of screening, and had adequate safety laboratory parameters including calculated creatinine clearance >70 ml/min. Participants were randomized to study regimens for 48 weeks with follow-up visits at weeks 2, 4, 8, and then every 8 weeks. At each visit, history, physical exam, safety laboratories, blood plasma for drug concentrations, adherence counseling, and HIV testing were conducted. All analyses were intent-to-treat. Results: 12 HPTN and ACTG sites enrolled 188 women with a median age of 35 (range 18-61), including 65% black, 27% white, and 17% Latina participants. 153 (81%) completed study follow-up; 15 (8%) were lost to follow-up. 37 (20%) permanently discontinued the study regimen early, including 16 (8%) for participant request and 10 (5%) for pregnancy; rates and times to study drug discontinuation did not differ among the study arms (both p>0.2). MVC-alone was associated with fewer grade 2-4 adverse events than either TDF-containing regimen (p< 0.01); MVC+FTC was associated with fewer events than MVC+TDF (p=0.02). In a random subset of participants (n=125) at random study time points, 66% had detectable study drug plasma concentrations. 4 women had sexually transmitted infections while on study (3 chlamydia, 1 gonorrhea.) No HIV infections were identified during the study; the annual HIV incidence in women on this study was 0% [95% CI: 0%, 2.5%]. Conclusions: In this study of HIV PrEP in women, MVC-containing regimens were safe and well-tolerated compared to the control regimen of TDF+FTC. Only 2/3 had detectable study drug concentrations, but no HIV infections were identified. MVC-containing regimens should be explored further as oral PrEP for women.